I have had WSN Links 3.16 for about a week. I installed it no problem, and have been changing the default css also without problems. In short, I like it, love it, everything is great.
However, there are several features I would like to have in version 3.20, but the members download area says about 3.20: "This is the current release of WSN Links. If you prefer an older, more proven version then use the stable branch instead."
So, is 3.20 stable enough for someone who is html and css profecient but PHP clueless?
Stability isn't a matter of your knowledge, it's a matter of your needs. If your company loses big money in the event that some feature is disfunctional and you don't realize it for a while, you should use 3.1. If you want more features, you should use 3.2.
0/5
1
2
3
4
5
This thread is closed, so you cannot post a reply.
Comments on How stable is 3.20?
Beginner
Usergroup: Customer
Joined: Jul 30, 2005
Location: Kansas, USA
Total Topics: 4
Total Comments: 4
Hi,
I have had WSN Links 3.16 for about a week. I installed it no problem, and have been changing the default css also without problems. In short, I like it, love it, everything is great.
However, there are several features I would like to have in version 3.20, but the members download area says about 3.20: "This is the current release of WSN Links. If you prefer an older, more proven version then use the stable branch instead."
So, is 3.20 stable enough for someone who is html and css profecient but PHP clueless?
Thank you.
developer
Usergroup: Administrator
Joined: Dec 20, 2001
Location: Diamond Springs, California
Total Topics: 61
Total Comments: 7868
How in the world was this a bug report? Moved.
Stability isn't a matter of your knowledge, it's a matter of your needs. If your company loses big money in the event that some feature is disfunctional and you don't realize it for a while, you should use 3.1. If you want more features, you should use 3.2.