<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/css" href="https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/templates/bootstrap/rss.css" ?>
<rss version="2.0"
 xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
 xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
 xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
 xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"> 
<channel>
<title>WebmasterSite.net</title>
<link>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums</link>
<description></description>
<language>en-us</language>
<atom:link href="https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/rssfeed.php?thecondition=ownerid%3D653" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />

<item>
<title>3.14</title>
<description><![CDATA[Could you give some more information about 3.14?

Mainly curious whether or not I should upgrade from 3.13 (attachment tree turned on)]]></description>
<link>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/notitle-4747.html</link>
<pubDate>Fri, 14 Jan 2005 22:18:35 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/thread/4747/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[Could you give some more information about 3.14?

Mainly curious whether or not I should upgrade from 3.13 (attachment tree turned on)]]></content:encoded>
<comments>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/notitle-4747.html</comments>   
</item>

<item>
<title>Slideshow</title>
<description><![CDATA[It could use a manual entry. I&#039;m using it currently and it looks brilliantly, but couldn&#039;t find anything at all about it in the manual .]]></description>
<link>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/slideshow-4711.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:35:58 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/thread/4711/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[It could use a manual entry. I'm using it currently and it looks brilliantly, but couldn't find anything at all about it in the manual .]]></content:encoded>
<comments>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/slideshow-4711.html</comments>   
</item>

<item>
<title>previous next in wsnlinks</title>
<description>I'm using the following code in details.tpl:</description>
<link>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/previous-next-in-wsnlinks-4709.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 21:17:50 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/thread/4709/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[I'm using the following code in details.tpl:

Previous 
 | 
Next

Theoretically this should work perfectly as this is exactly the same as the default code in WSN Gallery details.tpl, only the IMAGECATID has been replaced by LINKCATID.

Steps to reproduce error 1:
1. Click on the first link in a category. (shows ok)
2. Click on Next.
3. Click on Previous.
4. Now the Previous button is active for the first link.
5. Click on Previous
6. It gives errors and shows a non-existant link.

Steps to reproduce error 2:
1. Click on the first link in a category. (shows ok)
2. Click on Next.
3. Keep clicking on next till the last link in the list.
4. Next is still shown. You can keep clicking on it. It stays with the same link and never disappears.

Will e-mail site example.]]></content:encoded>
<comments>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/previous-next-in-wsnlinks-4709.html</comments>   
</item>

<item>
<title>Required field missing - File remains</title>
<description><![CDATA[- attachment tree turned on.

1. I add a link with a file attachment to a category without a directory (probably makes no difference, but just in case). 
2. I forgot a required field. 
3. Logically I&#039;m required to reenter the link information.
4. THe link is now succesfully added.
5. I go with FTP to the directory
6. Two files are listed in the directory, even though there&#039;s only one link with a file.

Apparently the file is still uploaded, even though the required field information was incorrect.

Two problems with that:
- Bug: It should be deleted afterwards.
- Inefficient: It shouldn&#039;t be uploaded in the first place. If it&#039;s a big file, it may take 20 seconds or so to upload it, just to delete it because required fields were forgotten.]]></description>
<link>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/required-field-missing-file-remains-4708.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:37:17 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/thread/4708/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[- attachment tree turned on.

1. I add a link with a file attachment to a category without a directory (probably makes no difference, but just in case). 
2. I forgot a required field. 
3. Logically I'm required to reenter the link information.
4. THe link is now succesfully added.
5. I go with FTP to the directory
6. Two files are listed in the directory, even though there's only one link with a file.

Apparently the file is still uploaded, even though the required field information was incorrect.

Two problems with that:
- Bug: It should be deleted afterwards.
- Inefficient: It shouldn't be uploaded in the first place. If it's a big file, it may take 20 seconds or so to upload it, just to delete it because required fields were forgotten.]]></content:encoded>
<comments>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/required-field-missing-file-remains-4708.html</comments>   
</item>

<item>
<title>Category special chars</title>
<description><![CDATA[- Attachment tree turned on

If some characters (like &quot;.&quot;) are used in the category title, the actual category that&#039;s created isn&#039;t viewable because &quot;.&quot; isn&#039;t rewritten correctly.

As some sites allow users (moderators) to suggest or even add categories manually there&#039;s some mechanism needed to prevent them from adding categories that can&#039;t be viewed.

Maybe: An extra option for purely the category title field in which symbols can be indicated that aren&#039;t allowed. By default it would be filled with the same symbols that can&#039;t be rewritten.]]></description>
<link>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/category-special-chars-4707.html</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2005 17:32:34 GMT</pubDate>
<guid>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/thread/4707/</guid>
<content:encoded><![CDATA[- Attachment tree turned on

If some characters (like ".") are used in the category title, the actual category that's created isn't viewable because "." isn't rewritten correctly.

As some sites allow users (moderators) to suggest or even add categories manually there's some mechanism needed to prevent them from adding categories that can't be viewed.

Maybe: An extra option for purely the category title field in which symbols can be indicated that aren't allowed. By default it would be filled with the same symbols that can't be rewritten.]]></content:encoded>
<comments>https://www.webmastersite.net/forums/threads/category-special-chars-4707.html</comments>   
</item>

</channel>
</rss>