Can some one pls clarify if using full URLs or just file names is better? I would think using filenames within pages would run faster then using full URLs but I could be wrong.
In other words which would be better (SEO point of view, speed, etc.) to use and why
If you're on a 4 baud modem, then yes, using relative URLs will make the page load in only 8 years 9 months 15 days 6 hours 4 minutes 26 seconds instead of absolute URLs loading in 8 years 9 months 15 days 6 hours 4 minutes 27 seconds. SEO-wise, it's irrelevant.
Thanks Paul for clearing up on this. I was under the impression of a full URL taking longer as it would have to be resolved each timed it's called but then again it may be cached in.. in which case speed should be irrelevant.
A relative URL -- one which does not include the domain name -- is the kind that has to be transformed by the software into the full URL and therefore takes a nanosecond longer for the web browser to process.
0/5
1
2
3
4
5
Sorry, you don't have permission to post posts. Log in, or register if you haven't yet.
Comments on http://www.xyz.com/abc.htm vs abc.htm
Experienced
Usergroup: Customer
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
Total Topics: 16
Total Comments: 60
Off topic...
Can some one pls clarify if using full URLs or just file names is better?
I would think using filenames within pages would run faster then using full URLs but I could be wrong.
In other words which would be better (SEO point of view, speed, etc.) to use and why
http://www.xyz.com/category/abc.htm
or just
/category/abc.htm
Thanks, Joe
developer
Usergroup: Administrator
Joined: Dec 20, 2001
Location: Diamond Springs, California
Total Topics: 61
Total Comments: 7867
If you're on a 4 baud modem, then yes, using relative URLs will make the page load in only 8 years 9 months 15 days 6 hours 4 minutes 26 seconds instead of absolute URLs loading in 8 years 9 months 15 days 6 hours 4 minutes 27 seconds. SEO-wise, it's irrelevant.
Experienced
Usergroup: Customer
Joined: Aug 04, 2007
Total Topics: 16
Total Comments: 60
Thanks Paul for clearing up on this.
I was under the impression of a full URL taking longer as it would have to be resolved each timed it's called but then again it may be cached in.. in which case speed should be irrelevant.
developer
Usergroup: Administrator
Joined: Dec 20, 2001
Location: Diamond Springs, California
Total Topics: 61
Total Comments: 7867
A relative URL -- one which does not include the domain name -- is the kind that has to be transformed by the software into the full URL and therefore takes a nanosecond longer for the web browser to process.